Journal of Orthopaedic Nursing
Volume 9, Issue 2 , Pages 87-94 , May 2005

Hip resurfacing: Past, present and future

  • Debbie Adams, MA, BSc(Hons), ENB, 219, RGN (Research Nurse)

      Affiliations

    • Corresponding Author InformationCorresponding author. Present address: Research and Teaching Centre, Royal Orthopaedic Hospital NHS Trust, Bristol Road South, Northfield, Birmingham B31 2AP, UK. Tel.: +44 121 685 4024; fax: +44 121 685 4030.
  • ,
  • Sharon Quigley (Audit Nurse)

References 

  1. Amstutz HC, Beaule PE, Dorey FJ, Le Duff MJ, Campbell PA, Gruen TA. Metal on metal hybrid surface arthroplasty: two to six year follow up study. Journal of Bone & Joint Surgery A. 2004;86(1):28–39
  2. ANCA-Clinic, 2003. Metal bearings: resurfacing. ANCA Available from: <http://www.hip-clinic.com->.
  3. Apley, G., Solomon, L., 2001. Concise system of orthopaedics and fracture’s Arnold, London, p. 42.
  4. ASERNIPS, 2001. New and emerging techniques – surgical Australian Safety and Efficacy Register of New Interventional Procedures-Surgical. Available from: <http://www.surgeons.org/asernip-s/net-s>.
  5. Beaule PE, Dorey FJ, Le Duff M, Greun T, Amstutz HC. Risk factors affecting outcome of metal-on-metal surface arthroplasty of the hip. Clinical Orthopaedic. 2004;(418):87–93
  6. Bernath, V., 2002. Hip resurfacing in patients with osteoarthritis Centre for clinical effectiveness. Available from: <http://wwwmed.monash.edu.au/healthservices/cce>.
  7. Bierbaum B, Sweet R. Complications of resurfacing arthroplasty. Orthopaedics Clinics of North America. 1982;13(4):761–775
  8. Clarke MT, Lee PTH, Arora A, Villar RN. Levels of metal ions after small and large diameter metal on metal hip arthroplasty. Journal of Bone & Joint Surgery B. 2003;85(6):913–917
  9. CCOHTA, 2003. Pre assessment metal on metal hip resurfacing. The Canadian Coordinating for Health Technology Assessment. Available from: <http://www.ccohta.ca->.
  10. Dawson J, Fitzpatrick R, Carr A, Murray D. Questionnaire on the perception of patients about total hip replacement. Journal of Bone & Joint Surgery B. 1996;78(2):185–190
  11. Daniel J, Pynsett PB, McMinn DJW. Metal on metal resurfacing of the hip in patients under the age of 55 years with osteoarthritis. Journal of Bone & Joint Surgery B. 2004;86(2):177–184
  12. De Smet KA, Pattyn C, Verdonk R. Early results of primary Birmingham hip resurfacing using a hybrid metal on metal couple. Hip International. 2002;12(2):158–162
  13. Duke, 2004. Hip resurfacing system. Duke Total Joint Centre, Duke University. Available from: <http://www.dukehealth.org->.
  14. Endotec, 2000. Buechel-Pappas integrated total hip replacement system. EndoTec Inc. Available from: <http://www.endotec.com->.
  15. Halonen, P.J., Puolakka, T.J.S., Pajamaki, K.J., Syrja, H., 2004. Metal on metal hybrid surface arthroplasty in Tampere, Finland – a prospective study – early results. In: Proc. of the 52nd Congress of The Nordic Orthopaedic Federation.
  16. Harris WH. Traumatic arthritis of the hip after dislocation and acetabular fracture: treatment by mold arthroplasty. An end-result study using a new method of result evaluation. Journal of Bone & Joint Surgery A. 1969;51(4):737–755
  17. Howie DW, Cornish BL, Vernon-Roberts B. Resurfacing hip arthroplasty. Classification of loosening and the role of prosthetic wear particles. Clinical Orthopaedics and Related Research. 1990;(255):144–159
  18. McMinn DJW. Development of metal/metal hip resurfacing. Hip International. 2003;13(1 Suppl. 2):541–553
  19. McMinn D, Treacy R, Kyaw L, Pynsent P. Metal on metal surface replacement of the hip, experience of the McMinn prosthesis. Clinical Orthopaedics and Related Research. 1996;(329):89–98
  20. MMT, 2003. Birmingham hip resurfacing. Available from: <http://www.midmedtec.co.uk/>.
  21. National Institute for Clinical Excellence, 2002. Guidance on the use of metal on metal hip resurfacing arthroplasty, Technology appraisal Guidance No. 44.
  22. Nelson EC, Wasson JH, Kirk J, et al. Assessment of function in routine clinical practice: description of the Coop chart method and preliminary findings. Journal of Chronic Diseases. 1987;40(Suppl.1):55–63
  23. Pollard TCB, Basu C, Ainsworth R, et al. Is the Birmingham hip resurfacing worthwhile?. Hip International. 2003;13(1):25–28
  24. Schmalzried TP, Fowble VA, Ure KJ, Amstutz C. Metal on metal surface replacement of the hip technique, fixation and early results. Clinical Orthopaedics and Related Research. 1996;(329):106–114
  25. Tharani R, Dorey FJ, Schmalzried TP. The risk of cancer following total hip or knee arthroplasty. Journal of Bone & Joint Surgery A. 2001;83(5):774–780
  26. Treacy, R.B.C., McBryde, C.W., Pynsent, P.B., 2004. Birmingham hip resurfacing – patients with at least 5 years of follow up (unpublished).
  27. Wagner M, Wagner H. Preliminary results of un-cemented metal on metal stemmed and resurfacing hip replacements arthroplasty. Clinical Orthopaedics and Related Research. 1996;(329):78–88

PII: S1361-3111(05)00024-5

doi: 10.1016/j.joon.2005.03.008

Journal of Orthopaedic Nursing
Volume 9, Issue 2 , Pages 87-94 , May 2005