Journal of Orthopaedic Nursing
Volume 12, Issue 1 , Pages 26-34, February 2008

A multidisciplinary assessment and intervention for patients awaiting total hip replacement to improve their quality of life

St Mary’s Hospital, Newport, Isle of Wight PO30 5TG, United Kingdom

published online 09 December 2008.

Editor’s comments The author has struggled to get to grips with the complexities of researching interventions to maximise the outcomes for hip replacement patients on the waiting list. The randomised controlled trial lacked sufficient numbers of participants to be able to draw any conclusions. The use of the Arthritis Impact Measurement Score was probably ill advised as the domains related to hand and finger functions etc are not that appropriate. Possibly The Harris or Oxford Hip Score would have been better. However, the descriptive data from the intervention of introducing a multidisciplinary team approach to improve the quality of life of these patients showed many interesting results. To not publish work such as this due to failure to achieve significance in the results could be deemed as an example of publication bias as others are deprived of the opportunity to learn from others attempts. PD

Summary 

The purpose of this small scale study was to determine the efficacy of undertaking a multidisciplinary assessment and intervention to improve the quality of life for patients waiting for a Total Hip Replacement. The waiting list at the time of this study ranged between 3 and 16 months. Patients on the waiting list for total hip replacement were recruited (n=89) then randomly allocated to an intervention group and a control group. The control group received no additional treatment. Those allocated to the intervention group received a multidisciplinary assessment and intervention. The physiotherapist assessed gait analysis and provided an exercise regime to follow, a physical assessment with pre-operative advice from the orthopaedic nurse specialist, pain control evaluation and advice from the nurse specialist in acute pain, and a home visit by the occupational therapist. Quality of life was assessed with the Arthritis Impact Measurement Score 2 and the Nottingham Health Profile. Questionnaires were administered post randomisation and pre surgery.

No definitive conclusions could be drawn on the basis of the inferential statistical results obtained. Statistical significance was shown for only three of the 21 domains assessed, and therefore the null hypothesis had to be accepted. Interpretation of the descriptive data collected during the health professional assessment did however yield important implications for future practice.

Keywords: Multidisciplinary assessment, Pre-operative total hip replacement, Total hip replacement, Joint arthroplasty, Osteoarthritis

 

PII: S1361-3111(07)00113-6

doi:10.1016/j.joon.2007.11.002

Journal of Orthopaedic Nursing
Volume 12, Issue 1 , Pages 26-34, February 2008