Journal of Orthopaedic Nursing
Volume 13, Issue 4 , Pages 172-182, November 2009

A health comparison of Alabama nurses versus US, UK, and Canadian normative populations

  • G. Talley Holman, MBA, PhD

      Affiliations

    • Center for Quality and Productivity Improvement, University of Wisconsin-Madison, 1550 Engineering Drive, Madison, WI 53706-1609, USA
    • Corresponding Author InformationCorresponding author. Tel.: +1 229 308 0794; fax: +1 608 265 8454.
  • ,
  • Robert E. Thomas, PE, CPE, PhD

      Affiliations

    • Director of the Occupational Safety and Ergonomics Program, Industrial and System Engineering, Auburn University, 212 Dunstan Hall, Auburn, AL 36849, USA
    • Tel.: +1 334 844 1420; fax: +1 334 844 1381.
  • ,
  • Kathleen C. Brown, RN, PhD

      Affiliations

    • Director of Occupational Health Nursing, School of Nursing, University of Alabama Birmingham, NB 230, Birmingham, AL 35294-1210, USA
    • Tel.: +1 205 934 6858; fax: +1 205 975 6142.

published online 17 July 2009.

Summary 

This article is one of a two part series examining the people and environment associated with patient handling. The approach used was that of an occupational injury investigation of a job class, which incorporates defining in the task, environment, tools, and worker health status. Hence, the objective of this portion of the research was to develop a method and use it to compare the physical and mental health of Alabama nurses with known normative populations to determine a baseline of overall health. For this purpose, the validated SF-36© survey was used to collect data on Alabama nurses who had been registered in the state for at least one year. The potential participant pool included 1000 nurses randomly selected from more than 49,000 registered. Physical mailers with a pre-paid return envelope and a follow-up reminder post-card were used. A return rate of 10% was expected based on nursing literature. One hundred and one surveys were returned with 87 being complete. Results confirmed that nursing in the US is a female dominated profession with the survey matching both the Alabama and US national average of 92%. Comparisons of the sample data to general populations yielded significant differences in 3 of the 8 outcome measures: social functioning; physical functioning; bodily pain. In each of these measures, Alabama nurses had a reduced health status compared to at least one comparative population. Additionally, data related to body mass index (BMI) for Alabama nurses were stratified by gender and age. Results indicated 28% had a “healthy” BMI with 37% and 35% of the nurses being “overweight” or “obese”, respectively. Consequently, results suggest Alabama nurses have a reduced health status compared to normative populations and show similar but not identical BMI trends to the general populations for the state of Alabama and the US, which warrants concerns about potential declines in health status among caregivers.

Significance to healthcare

Nurses constitute the largest proportion of the healthcare industry’s workforce. Understanding the perceptions of health status of this employee group is essential to gain further information about possible influences of health on nurses’ ability to continue to perform their jobs.

Keywords: Nursing, Health, Survey, Population, Comparison

To access this article, please choose from the options below

Login to an existing account or Register a new account.

  • Purchase this article for 31.50 USD (You must login/register to purchase this article)

    Online access for 24 hours. The PDF version can be downloaded as your permanent record.

  • Subscribe to this title

    Get unlimited online access to this article and all other articles in this title 24/7 for one year.

  • Claim access now

    For current subscribers with Society Membership or Account Number.

  • Visit SciVerse ScienceDirect to see if you have access via your institution.
 

PII: S1361-3111(09)00089-2

doi:10.1016/j.joon.2009.03.005

Journal of Orthopaedic Nursing
Volume 13, Issue 4 , Pages 172-182, November 2009